|
|
Just over 80 of the Takamine EF75 guitars
were build from 2005 to 2007. Below is the list of known owners
who
have chosen to register their guitars on this site.
|
Serial
No. |
Owner |
Description |
Photos |
06 |
Dave
Bolton |
EF75,
Obtained March 2008 |
|
21 |
Debanjo |
EF75 |
|
26 |
Lance Allen |
EF75 |
|
34 |
Marino
Scazzosi |
EF75,
Obtained January 2008 |
|
35 |
Laurent Merchante |
EF75 |
|
43 |
Greg
Thomas |
EF75 |
|
44 |
Kris |
EF75,
Obtained February 2008 |
|
47 |
Mark Bourne |
EF75,
Obtained September 2010 |
|
49 |
Steve
Leaves |
EF75 |
|
50 |
Clay O'Neill |
EF75, Obtained August 2009 |
|
53 |
Mike Jeffs |
EF75 |
|
59 |
Kostas Alexandroff |
EF75 |
|
61 |
cwktwo |
EF75 |
|
62 |
TicTak |
EF75, Obtained January 2009 |
|
63 |
Cypher |
EF75, Obtained
December 2008 |
|
66 |
Koenig Kurt |
EF75 |
|
67 |
Professor BB |
EF75 |
|
70 |
Thomas
Stewart |
EF75,
Obtained October 2007 |
|
71 |
cwktwo |
EF75 |
|
72 |
Tacky |
EF75, Obtained
February 2007 |
|
74 |
StephenT28 |
EF75 |
|
75 |
Matthew Hartzell |
EF75, Obtained Mach 2009 |
|
77 |
Tony Calman |
EF75, Obtained
April 2010 |
|
82 |
Colt357 |
EF75,
Obtained March 2007 |
|
|
Curtis
Morgan |
EF75,
Serial number unknown |
|
|
Please
click HERE
if you are an EF75 owner and would like to add your guitar to the
registration list.
|
|
Owners
Reviews |
cwk2:
For the box fans out
there, when in the mood for something a little different check
out one of the EF75J model Taks. An OM model with vintage
Brazilian back and sides, 1 3/4 neck of one piece, no add on
heel and dove tail construction, not the normal 4 dowel method.
The regular palenthetic pickup and an inline preamp set flat (no
controls on the guitar) with an end pin jack. All wood binding
and Gotoh Waverly style keys … It is a completely amazing
guitar (like TOTALLY man, as they would say). I just played a
second one that will live in
North Carolina
with Debanjo, and it matches the first.
|
|
|
Cliff:
These
ARE
very nice boxes!! QUITE
comfortable, and great playability.
Not overtly "loud", but it's got a great, sweet tone
to it. I didn't hear
it plugged in, but the acoustic sound is
REAL
nice!
|
|
|
StephenT:
Dave, this
guitar is amazing. 1st
of all you get an all Brazilian Rosewood Back and Sides. If it
says Martin, you just spent a minimum 10 grand! This one can be
had for 1/4 of that amount.
Now I have only had it and played it for maybe 5-6 hours
so it hasn't had a chance to open up but already it is in my top
5....maybe top 3. It
has a beautiful full even tone across the spectrum and is
moderately loud. Not as loud as an Adamas or D-28 but certainly
louder than you would expect from an
OM
sized guitar. Of
course, if you strum it hard it gets pretty damn loud yet when
you fingerpick it, it has a certain delicacy that is soothing to
hear...and through all of this it maintains an even tone with
all the strings...none louder or softer...just very even and
smooth.
This guitar would be worth it at easily twice the price and it
is also incredibly beautiful. It has one of the best looking
fingerboard bindings I have ever seen on an acoustic. The wood
top had a terrific grain pattern and the bling is subtle yet
eye-catching.
Overall impressions with the limited time I have played
it...THIS IS A WINNER! and with less than 100 being made (mine
is #74) I would put this right up there with the Adamas #47 RI
(and for far less) as a must have.
Whether you are strumming cowboy chords, playing rhythm,
ripping leads, or finger picking this guitar is hard to fault.
It does it all good.
|
|
|
Debanjo:
Mine is #21 and I love it. It sounds bigger than a regular
OM.
|
|
|
Tupperware:
I got mine today serial #72. The guitar is everything Bill and
Stephen said it was. Very nicely made, high quality all around.
Really a bargain at what they are selling for. Definitely worth
every penny. Sound is very pleasing, quite warm and woody just
the way I like it. The setup is perfect and overall I'm very
pleased. The neck is a beefy C shape. Not what I'm used to, but
easy to adapt to. The guitar plays wonderfully. Have not plugged
in, but I'm sure that's really nice as well. Acoustically it
rings like a bell, even with the EXPs (which I never care for).
Stephen commented that it was not overly loud. I find it just as
load as the Martin OM or Norman Blake. No match for a dread or a
textured Adamas, but it's a different animal.
Anyone looking to step up to a premium guitar that's going to be
highly collectable (I think only 80 are made) I would seriously
recommend this one. If it said Taylor or Martin on it it would
cost a grand more. The Brazilian rosewood thing isn't all that
important to me vs. east indian r/w, but if brazillian is what
want you won't find it in a guitar for twice the price.
Thanks Bill and Stephen for a great recommendation. I'm
really happy with this.
|
|
|
StephenT:
You know, I have never been one to take the time to worry about
bracings, nut widths, neck shapes, etc. I just play it and
decide if it feels good, sounds good, looks good, and talks to
me. If I get 3 outta 4, then it is usually a winner. The Tak is
a 4 outta 4.
This being a limited run of 80 or so with very rare and aged
Brazilian Rosewood, I would imagine that Tak has their best
craftsmen on it. These are not run of the mill guitars and I am
sure they have been crafted to reflect that. Mine seems perfect
in just about every way I could think to check it out.
Mine looks pretty much identical to the one in the video
with the exception that my maple binding on the neck in heavily
figured like the body binding. The video seems to have figuring
on the body binding but the neck binding looks plain. The
binding is absolutely beautiful to look at....stunning!
Oh yeah....with another 5-6 hours on it, I believe it
already sounds better than when I first played it. I can only
imagine the sound in 6 months, 6 years, etc! This one will
NOT be going anywhere.
|
|
|
Colt357:
Awesome looks!!! The
Brazilian Rosewood on #82 is very dark. You have to hold it to
the light just right to see the grain. Would have liked a little
more light grain. Was surprised to see the headstock overlay is
B/R...thought it would be ebony. The maple around the body is
well figured ,light and dark, but that around the neck, while
still well figured, is lighter. The Abalone purfling is simply
spectacular. I thought my Ovation was nicely done with Abalone
(and it is), but nothing like this EF75J!
Sound/tone... AWESOME!!!! Rings like a bell on the high
side and rumbles like a train on the low end!!!
We plugged it in at the music store (I don't have an acoustic
amp) ...HOLY SMOKES!!! WOW!!!...I
could keep on going but you get the idea. You would think this
guitar had been played for 20 years; like Stephen had said, I
can't wait to hear what the years do to it.
Playability...very comfortable, I'm very pleased. My
fingers are rather short and fat, and I was concerned about the
wider neck, but I like it.
|
|
|
Tupperware:
I must say, the EF75 keeps climbing it's way up my list of
favorite guitars. Plays like a dream and the body size just
feels so perfect. And like I said the sound is everything you
could ask for. Seriously, if you are at all sitting on the fence
about investing in a premium guitar you really need to consider
the EF75. Dave
|
|
|
cwk2:
I have been playing the dread EF340S BG, the bluegrass mahogany
dread and it's great, a little different sound than the 75. I
keep coming back to the 75 for what Dave just said, it's
comfortable. The dread seems to stretch my right shoulder after
playing it a while, and while I like the boom, the 75 always
seems a bit more balanced in tone. Tak really hit a hole in one
on this guitar.
|
|
|
ProfessorBB:
No. 67 arrived today in its custom tan case direct from the factory!
The fit and finish of the guitar is outstanding, and the attention
to detail in the abalone inlays is extraordinary. For instance,
there is even a small round inlay on the head of the string end
pins. If you appreciate the quality of a Lexus (I do), then you
will appreciate the quality of this guitar. The Japanese can be
perfectionists when it comes to quality control, and this guitar
demonstrates this in spades. Contrary
to the darker finish of the Brazilian Rosewood on Colt’s No.
82, the finish on this one is a little lighter. I would call it
medium dark. The
binding is also exquisite.
|
|
|
Colt357:
This guitar just makes me smile!
I smile when I look at it; it is one of, if not the most,
elegant looking guitars I have ever seen. Not gaudy, not over
the top, just balanced elegance.
I smile when I play it; once again, just true balanced
tone. The sound is sooo smooooth! I've never played a nicer
sounding guitar, period. To my ear this puts out pure cream.
I smile when I think of the concerns I had over the width at the
nut and whether the volume would be a large compromise to a
dread due to the
OM
body size. All unfounded. I said before it was comfortable to
play, and I think few would disagree after spending some time on
it. The volume, although less than my Ovation, is more than
offset by the truly balanced full sound. Like others have said,
this guitar puts out a sound out of proportion to its' size.
And I smile when I think back to when I felt a Takamine could
not compete with my desire to buy a Martin. This guitar just
kicked Martin of that high pedestal I had it on. No, I'm not
running down Martin guitars. I still feel they are very good
instruments, but this Takamine is as good as any Martin made, in
my book.
And I smile at the fact that I would not have one of these
beautiful guitars if I did not spend time here at the
OFC
.
Bill, Stephen, Dave, thank you for putting in the time to get
the word out and make a believer out of a sceptic. You all read
my concerns and if not for your insistence in all that this
guitar is, I probably would not have pursued this to the end. Of
course 2 minutes with it at the music store proved every point
you made.
For any of you sitting on the fence like I was, I seriously urge
you to make the jump. Time is running out fast. You will not
regret it. Bill said it all when he stated that Takamine "hit a hole in
one" with this guitar.
And I still think this is s "Sleeper Guitar".
Soon they will all be gone (100 or less to be made) and when
it's all over and done, guys are going to be cryin' "How
come I never heard about these?"
|
|
|
ProfessorBB:
O.k., spent some time with the new Tak this weekend. First, I put
new batteries and strings on the other models for the comparo
just to keep things even. Included besides the Tak were the
Adamas 1581, Ovation Ad-II, Ovation 1651 Legend Ltd, Ovation
Book Elite, and the Ovation EA-68 Viper. I then played each for
about an hour with and without various effects on the Zoom, and
I even made some loops with one guitar and dubbed some melody
and lead lines with another. Here’s my personal take . . .
COMFORT: The first thing that struck me about the Tak was the
comfort. It is nice and light, and the smaller
OM
size just feels really good to hold. It
fits my body size and type (5'9", 180 lbs, relatively
athletic for an old guy). I thought the neck felt short, but
measurements revealed that it is a pinch longer than almost
everything else in my studio. I also felt like the wider neck
(1-7/8") kept me from inadvertently fuzzing out an adjacent
open string on some chords, thereby resulting in very clean
chord structure. I have stayed away from wider necks all my life
because of my small hands, but this guitar now makes me think
that this may be baggage from my learning days as a pre-teen.
TONE: The tone is light and crisp. Some folks might refer to
this as a “woody” tone, but I haven’t played enough all
wood guitars to know. Plugged
in, it compares very well with the Ovations. The
resonance and sustain are excellent.
APPEARANCE: The Tak is simply breathtaking. The
spruce top is more blonde than golden, but the Brazilian
Rosewood back and sides are incomparable. The neck is darker on
mine than others appearing in this posting, and the finish is
more of a semi-gloss than the satin sheen seen on some Ovations.
The tuners look very fancy and allow very minute adjustments,
noticeably more so than on the others.
OVERALL: I will gig with this guitar. I have an art gallery show
next month where I am playing three hours of background solo
instrumental stuff and will very likely use this guitar with the
Zoom, loop machine, and the Trace.
VERDICT: The Tak is a sensational guitar and I am glad I jumped
on this when I could. I would not sell it back to the factory
for what I paid. Thanks to cwk2 for bringing it to our
attention, and to StephenT for validating the news with his
review. It isn’t a do-all guitar and won‘t take the place of
others, … but the Tak is most definitely on the A team.
|
|
|
cwk2:
My #71 is pretty dark too. That grain is really nice! Another thing
I like is the way the back stripe has that wave going through it
and the oval dots are cool.
I talked to Debanjo today and his comment is that his, #21, is
the most addicting guitar he's ever played. He's been gigging
with in around
Asheville
and running it through an old Shobud volume pedal. He said he
can't see himself ever playing a smaller neck again.
|
|
|
ProfessorBB:
I've been using mine almost exclusively for the past three weeks.
Most of the comments on these forums have been about the EF75J's
great sound, but what amazes me is the comfort and ease of
playing. One of the songs we're doing this week requires a lot
of strumming with seconds and suspended chords, but the last
eight measures are all adagio picking, which is more my style.
Folks are coming up to me, complimenting me about the sound, and
asking questions about the guitar. The Tak EF75 really allows
players to elevate their playing quality a notch or two. I am
really pleased with it.
|
|
|
This website is not affiliated in any way
with Takamine Guitar Co. or Kaman Music Corp.
© 2007-2010 takaminegallery.com
|
|